<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[agenda] RE: Re[4]: [ga] RE: Recall of GA Chair
|> From: William X Walsh [mailto:william@userfriendly.com]
|> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 3:50 PM
|>
|> Thursday, Thursday, October 04, 2001, 3:45:22 PM, Patrick
|> Greenwell wrote:
|>
|> > On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:
|>
|> >> The GA has been absolutely unproductive since its
|> inception, period. It
|> >> always has been. The DNSO NC isn't much better, as has
|> been reported in
|> >> WG-Review. Where is this particular instance any
|> different? This could lead
|> >> one to the conclusion that changing leadership would not
|> improve things one
|> >> iota and that it would be, in fact, deconstructive.
|> >>
|> >> The real problem is that we have no focus because we, in
|> fact, have nothing
|> >> credible to focus on.
|>
|> > What he said.
|>
|> Which is, of course, the fault of our chair.
So, you're holding the current chair responsible for failures from the
inception of the DNSO GA? I didn't think that you were either that unfair or
irrational.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|