ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[agenda]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[agenda] RE: Re[4]: [ga] RE: Recall of GA Chair


|> From: William X Walsh [mailto:william@userfriendly.com]
|> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 3:50 PM
|> 
|> Thursday, Thursday, October 04, 2001, 3:45:22 PM, Patrick 
|> Greenwell wrote:
|> 
|> > On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:
|> 
|> >> The GA has been absolutely unproductive since its 
|> inception, period. It
|> >> always has been. The DNSO NC isn't much better, as has 
|> been reported in
|> >> WG-Review. Where is this particular instance any 
|> different? This could lead
|> >> one to the conclusion that changing leadership would not 
|> improve things one
|> >> iota and that it would be, in fact, deconstructive.
|> >>
|> >> The real problem is that we have no focus because we, in 
|> fact, have nothing
|> >> credible to focus on.
|> 
|> > What he said.
|> 
|> Which is, of course, the fault of our chair.

So, you're holding the current chair responsible for failures from the
inception of the DNSO GA? I didn't think that you were either that unfair or
irrational.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>