ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[agenda]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[agenda] Re[5]: [ga] RE: Recall of GA Chair


Thursday, Thursday, October 04, 2001, 4:01:11 PM, Patrick Greenwell wrote:

> On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, William X Walsh wrote:

>> Thursday, Thursday, October 04, 2001, 3:45:22 PM, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:
>>
>> >> The GA has been absolutely unproductive since its inception, period. It
>> >> always has been. The DNSO NC isn't much better, as has been reported in
>> >> WG-Review. Where is this particular instance any different? This could lead
>> >> one to the conclusion that changing leadership would not improve things one
>> >> iota and that it would be, in fact, deconstructive.
>> >>
>> >> The real problem is that we have no focus because we, in fact, have nothing
>> >> credible to focus on.
>>
>> > What he said.
>>
>> Which is, of course, the fault of our chair.

> William, what productive contributions have you made to the GA other than
> casting blame and critcizing?

This isn't about me, it's about the Chair.

What has the Chair contributed to the development of consensus policy
within the GA is the better and more appropriate question to this
discussion.

-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>