RE: Revision of attendees' list [was: Re: [council] Letter from M ike Roberts re: gTLD Constituency Group]

[Javier SOLA <javier@aui.es>]

The agenda is in the ww.dnso.org website. 

You should have already received the call in data from the council list on
Friday.

Javier

At 14:36 11/07/99 -0400, Telage, Don wrote:
>Amadeu and Joe, Thanks for the clarification.  We will participate with the
>three gTLD representatives David Johnson, Phil Sbarbaro and myself.  Would
>you be so kind as to forward the agenda and call in information to me so
>that I can forward to the others?  Thank you for your help.  don 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Amadeu Abril i Abril [SMTP:Amadeu@nominalia.com]
>Sent:	Sunday, July 11, 1999 1:29 PM
>To:	Telage, Don
>Cc:	council@dnso.org; Mike Roberts (E-mail); jsola@aui.es
>Subject:	Re: Revision of attendees' list [was: Re: [council] Letter
>from M ike Roberts re: gTLD Constituency Group]
>
>Telage, Don wrote:
>> 
>> Amadeu, I'm a bit confused. Based on Mike Roberts Friday reply to Jim
>Rutt,
>> the gTLD constituency made no plans to be on the call. Is this a change of
>> position from ICANN? If so, I will contact the other two constituency
>> members today and urge them to be available. Please let me know ASAP.  don
>> 
>
>I hope you understand that I cannot provide you with ICANN's views, but only
>with mine, that could perfeclty be ultraminoritarian within the NC.
>
>My take is that the BoD is requesting you to abide to community
>nearunanimous
>consensus. This means: just one gTLD NC rep.
>
>But as they seem to interprete that the current bylaws are unclear enough as
>to allow you, despite all other considration, to appoint three reps, they
>will
>ipropose some amendments in case you take that way, in order to get thigns
>back to what is deemed "normal".
>
>*MY* interpretation is that this means that it is entirely up to you to
>attend
>or not, with one or three reps....until the byalws are amended. I am sure
>that
>the sptirit and systematics of the bylaws require NSI to appoint just one
>rep,
>but the text is ambiguous enough as to allow you to appoint three. 
>
>If you want furhter clarificatin from the Board, please ask them. If you
>want
>my personal opinion, I will support your presnece in the upcoming meetings
>with any number, form one to three, of reps you might designate And I will
>restlessly push the Board to amend the bylaws in case you finally decide to
>appint three NC reps.
>
>Your chocie.
>
>Amadeu
>
>PS: pleae don't forget to inform the NC about your psoition an the name(s)
>of
>gTLD Cibnstituency rep(s), as my personal position could very well be not
>the
>one the rest of the NC wishes to express.
>