RE: [council] Agenda for the NC telecon July 27th is on the website

["Shapiro, Ted" <Ted_Shapiro@mpaa.org>]

Dear Elisabeth,

I don't know if anyone else has pointed this out yet, but there seems to be
a mix-up with agenda points #3 and #4. The "Report tracing the development
of the domain name transfer issue and a proposed amendment to the model
protocol presented at the last pNC teleconference (12 July 1999)" should
also be under point #3. This report is supposed to accompany the new
proposal. It was attached to the new proposal when I sent it in last night.
I apologize for the confusion.

BR, TED

-----Original Message-----
From: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE [mailto:Elisabeth.PORTENEUVE@cetp.ipsl.fr]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 1999 10:42 PM
To: council@dnso.org
Subject: [council] Agenda for the NC telecon July 27th is on the website


The agenda for the NC teleconference July 27th in on the website,
item:
    Calendar of DNSO Events, notes from meetings, documents 
Also under "New this week".
The URL is:
    http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/19990727.NCtelecon-agenda.html

Text of published agenda follows.
This info will be immediately sent to the ga and announce list.
Elisabeth

--
ICANN/DNSO
Names Council Teleconference on July 27th, 1999 - agenda

June 25, 1999. </p>

The Names Council teleconference will be held on July 27th,
9:30 - 11:30 Eastern US / 15:30 - 17:30 Central European

The agenda for the teleconference is:

1. Approval of the agenda.
2. Reports from developments in working groups B and C and Committee D.
3. Discussion and vote on Ted Shapiro's proposal.

     see http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/19990714.registrar.html
     Propo sal of model protocol for registrar to registrar handling 
     of requests by a domain name holder to change registrars 
     upon notice of a possible claim.

4. Discussion of the report on Dispute Resolution Policy.

     see http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/19990726.NSIdmtrdraft2.html
     Report tracing the development of the domain name transfer 
     issue and a proposed amendment to the model protocol presented 
     at the last pNC teleconference (12 July 1999).

5. Discussion on the webcasting for the Santiago meeting, and how 
   to proceed on addressing the cost issue for the DNSO/Santiago meetings.

     Some suggestions/comments have been received, and from those 
     that were useful and constructive we can discuss best 
     steps to proceed. While in the long-term this is an issue
     Committee D will need to include in it's work, until 
     this work is completed it's something we'll need to address 
     more on a 'meeting' by 'meeting' basis.