request (was... RE: [council] Meetings in LA

[Theresa Swinehart <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>]

I've not heard anything further with regards to asking the Berkman Center
(i.e., nothing saying the Names Council should not). I assume this means
that the NC should ask the Berkmann Center whether they can assist the NC.
Unless I hear otherwise in form of majority of opposition, I suggest we send
in a formal request by COB EST Wednesday, September 8th.

Does that sound acceptable?

Theresa

-----Original Message-----
From:	owner-council@dnso.org [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org] On Behalf Of
Richard Lindsay
Sent:	Thursday, September 02, 1999 11:12 AM
To:	council@dnso.org
Subject:	Re: [council] Meetings in LA

Resoundingly YES.   I believe we should ask the Berkman Center
to assist.

Theresa Swinehart wrote:

> Then the NC just needs to determine whether they'll be making the request.
I
> think we should, unless someone has a convincing reason why we shouldn't,
or
> has a different suggestion.
>
> I also think we need to decide whether we're going to ask them or not
within
> the next few days. I'd suggest that by Tuesday am, we should have decided
> whether to request the Berkman center or not (that is, September 7th).
>
> Do people agree with this timing?

Again YES.

> Also, we need to pick a date for the next conference call, where any
> proposal we receive can be discussed, the business issue is first on the
> agenda and will need to be addressed, etc. Suggestions for time, I know in
> Santiago there were certain dates many couldn't make it?

As far as time, 9:00am EST is 10:00pm Japan time, so this is a
pretty good time for Hotta-san and myself, YJ, is Korea an hour
later?  The only event that may clash for some of us would be
the next conference call regarding the Model Rules for the
Administrative Procedures with NSI, WIPO some of the Registrars.

Regards,
Richard
--
_/_/_/interQ Incorporated
_/_/_/System Division
_/_/_/Director and General Manager
_/_/_/Richard A. S. Lindsay