RE: [council] Dennis' motion geographaiversity (support thereof)

["Antonio Harris" <harris@cabase.org.ar>]

Dennis and Amadeu,

I also support this very strongly. Perhaps mistakenly, I thought this was
an obligation (see Article 6 section 2 of the ICANN bylaws).

Since there is little likelihood of the Latin America/Caribbean region
having a director elected to the board in either the PSO or the ASO,
it is important that this opportunity be open in the DNSO.

Tony Harris
CABASE
www.cabase.org.ar
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Amadeu Abril i Abril <Amadeu@nominalia.com>
Para: Dennis.Jennings@ucd.ie <Dennis.Jennings@ucd.ie>
CC: 'Javier' <javier@aui.es>; 'council@dnso.org' <council@dnso.org>
Fecha: Martes 14 de Septiembre de 1999 04:45
Asunto: [council] Dennis' motion geographaiversity (support thereof)


Dennis Jennings wrote:
>
> Amadeu,
>
> No - I meant exactly what I said.
[...]

> To make it even clearer, I propose that
>
> "The Names Council agree that no two of the three ICANN Board Directors
> elected by the DNSO may be residents (citizens ?) of the same geographic
> region."
>
I supoport that. And I am afraid tht the ˇcitizenship" requiremnt when
regarding Board Directors is very unlikely to be softened in any
occasion....

Amadeu