Re: [council] Proxy voting

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@dninet.net>]

i would agree completely here. the constituency should establish the
methodology for temporary replacements (keeping in consideration the
geographic requirements).

ken stubbs
----- Original Message -----
From: Amadeu Abril i Abril <Amadeu@nominalia.com>
To: <Dennis.Jennings@ucd.ie>
Cc: <council@dnso.org>; <mclaughlin@pobox.com>
Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: [council] Proxy voting


> Dennis Jennings wrote:
> >
> > Colleagues,
> >
> > I think that we should restrict proxies to other Names Council
> > members (except in the situation where a Council member has
> > accepted a nomination for election to the ICANN Board.)
> >
> Agreed.
>
> Regarding temporary replacments; is this a consituency only affair, or
> should be decided by the NC?
>
> My positon is the usual: the consituency is free to adopt the
> procedure, but has to communicate it to the NC, and the NC (or the
> Board, indeed) can rasie objections.
>
>
> Amadeu
>
>
>