Re: [council] Proxy voting

[HiroHOTTA <h.hotta@hco.ntt.co.jp>]

Dennis, Amadeu, Ken,

Let me agree with you on this point.

Hiro

At 99/10/05 08:29, owner-council@dnso.org wrote:
> i would agree completely here. the constituency should establish the
> methodology for temporary replacements (keeping in consideration the
> geographic requirements).
> 
> ken stubbs
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Amadeu Abril i Abril <Amadeu@nominalia.com>
> To: <Dennis.Jennings@ucd.ie>
> Cc: <council@dnso.org>; <mclaughlin@pobox.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 5:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [council] Proxy voting
> 
> 
> > Dennis Jennings wrote:
> > >
> > > Colleagues,
> > >
> > > I think that we should restrict proxies to other Names Council
> > > members (except in the situation where a Council member has
> > > accepted a nomination for election to the ICANN Board.)
> > >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > Regarding temporary replacments; is this a consituency only affair, or
> > should be decided by the NC?
> >
> > My positon is the usual: the consituency is free to adopt the
> > procedure, but has to communicate it to the NC, and the NC (or the
> > Board, indeed) can rasie objections.
> >
> >
> > Amadeu
> >
> >
> >
>  
----------
Hirofumi Hotta
R&D Strategy Department, NTT