[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[council] FYI.
> From DNSO.Listadmin@dnso.dnso.org Mon Oct 11 18:00 MET 1999
> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 18:00:01 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: owner-council@dnso.org
> To: owner-council@dnso.org
> Subject: BOUNCE council@dnso.org: Non-member submission from [Ellen Rony <erony@marin.k12.ca.us>]
>
> >From council-listadmin@dnso.dnso.org Mon Oct 11 18:00:00 1999
> Received: from marin.marin.k12.ca.us (marin.k12.ca.us [199.88.112.10])
> by dnso.dnso.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA08269
> for <council@dnso.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 17:59:58 +0200 (MET DST)
> Received: from [204.188.254.59] [204.188.254.59] by marin.marin.k12.ca.us with ESMTP
> (SMTPD32-5.05) id A9C4ACB01E2; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 09:01:08 -0700
> Message-Id: <l03130303b427c243b451@[204.188.254.59]>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 08:59:13 -0800
> To: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <Elisabeth.PORTENEUVE@cetp.ipsl.fr>
> From: Ellen Rony <erony@marin.k12.ca.us>
> Subject: Certification of the DNSO nominees to the ICANN board
> Cc: council@dnso.org, jeri@nytimes.com
>
> Ms. Porteneuve:
>
> On October 9 at 9:45 a.m., I sent a message to each member of the Names
> Council who is not also a nominee for DNSO representation on the ICANN
> board.
>
> I asked the Names Council to verify whether all 14 nominess have met the
> requirements as expressed in the following NC resolution, dated September
> 17:
>
> "The Names Council has resolved that a candidate, in order to be nominated
> must have the support of, at least, 10 members of the General Assembly. For
> this purpose, anybody who is subscribed to the General Assembly mailing
> list, the Announce mailing list or the list of one of the Constituencies of
> the DNSO is considered a member of the General Assembly."
> (http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/19990917.DNSO-ICANN-nominations.html)
>
> No one from the Names Council has responsed to my query, so I am now
> writing to you, as Secretariat, to request this certification be undertaken
> immediately, before the formal voting begins.
>
> It is an easy task to check whether the supporters of these nominees have,
> indeed, subscribed to the lists noted above and to certify whether the
> subscription of each *predates* their support submission.
>
> If this certification is not made, the results of the first election to the
> ICANN board will be suspect and anchored in controversy.
>
> Asking the Names Council to adhere to its own election requirements and
> certify the nominees should be a primary first task. The election outcome
> could be affected if any of the nominees failed to receive 10 VALID
> messages of support. I hope you will post the details of this
> certification on the General Assemby list by the end of the day.
>
> Regards,
>
> ............................................................................
> Ellen Rony ____ The Domain Name Handbook
> Co-author ^..^ )6 http://www.domainhandbook.com
> +1 (415) 435-5010 (oo) -^-- ISBN 0879305150
> Tiburon, CA W W erony@marin.k12.ca.us
> DOT COM is the Pig Latin of the Information Age
> ............................................................................
>
>
>
>