RE: Fw: [council] Fwd: [ga] Nominations

[Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>]

Council,

My understanding after yesterday conversation with Andrew McLaughlin
is that the ICANN lawyers are in charge of this item.

We probably will have some news from Andrew or Joe later on that subject.

Elisabeth
--

> From owner-council@dnso.org Wed Oct 13 14:19 MET 1999
> From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@netsol.com>
> To: "'Richard Lindsay'" <richard@interq.ad.jp>,
>         "'council@dnso.org'"
> 	 <council@dnso.org>
> Subject: RE: Fw: [council] Fwd: [ga] Nominations
> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 08:14:50 -0400
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> 
> I reiterate my concern that if questions have been raised about a candidate,
> we should do the checking now to lessen the chances that we would have to
> repeat the election process and thereby waste a considerable amount of time.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Lindsay [mailto:richard@interq.ad.jp]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 7:53 AM
> To: council@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: Fw: [council] Fwd: [ga] Nominations
> 
> 
> We have already discussed similar issues I believe, but once again,
> the requirements are that the 10 supporters must be in the
> DNSO, meaning they can be on or in:
> 
> 1.  the GA mailing list
> 2.  the announce mailing list
> 3.  any constituency mailing list
> 4.  any working group (meaning mailing list I assume?)
> 
> Mr. Veeck has listed only #1, and is using this as a basis of
> making a claim.  There is no need to discuss this.  But I do
> believe that before we submit the results of the elected BoD
> to the list we should check that there are at least 10 names
> on 1 or 2, if not we should go the extra mile to check 3 and 4
> as well.  In most cases this should not be difficult - perhaps
> in Mr. White's it will be - but we can do this after he is elected
> I believe (unless Elisabeth has the spare time - not likely - to
> check the status of the names in question below before the next
> teleconference.)
> 
> I know that there are issues with people signing up and then
> signing off right away, but at least as long as they were signed
> up when they nominated, they technically would meet the
> requirements.
> 
> Ready for another round?
> Richard
> 
> Ken Stubbs wrote:
> 
> 
> > hello all...
> > marilyn cade is active in working group c lists... i have seen many
> postings
> > from her
> > she is also subscribed to the registrar constituancy lists
> >
> >  ken
> >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> 
> >
> > > > >
> > > > >Perhaps someone can assist me. Here is the list of nominees and
> > > > >supporters for Rick White from http://www.dnso.org/nominees/rwh.html
> > > > >
> > > > >Nominations and statements of support for a nominee: (date of
> reception
> > > > >at the dnso.org, CET)
> > > > >
> > > > >          Rick White
> > > > >             1.1999/10/07 Rick White, nomination by Jerry Berman (not
> > > > >found)
> > > > >             2.1999/10/07 Rick White, support by Rhett B. Dawson
> > > > >             3.1999/10/07 Rick White, support by Jean Cantrell (not
> > > > >found)
> > > > >             4.1999/10/08 Rick White, support by Sheila O'Neill (not
> > > > >found)
> > > > >             5.1999/10/08 Rick White, support by Dennis Jennings
> > > > >             6.1999/10/08 Rick White, support by Marilyn Cade (not
> > > > >found)
> > > > >             7.1999/10/08 Rick White, support by Ken Whitaker (not
> > > > >found)
> > > > >             8.1999/10/08 Rick White, support by Philip Sheppard (not
> > > > >found)
> > > > >             9.1999/10/08 Rick White, support by Stanley W. Crosley
> > (not
> > > > >found)
> > > > >            10.1999/10/08 Rick White, support by Keith Gymer
> > > > >            11.1999/10/08 Rick White, support by Edward D. Lazowska
> > > > >
> > > > >I have downloaded the dnso ga list with who ga and the response was
> as
> > > > >follows.
> > > > >
> > > > >Majordomo@dnso.org wrote:
>