[council] RE: NC's UDRP WG

["Chicoine, Caroline" <chicoinc@PeperMartin.com>]

It was my understanding that at this stage the NC is simply setting up a
proposed charter for such a WG and that according to the bylaws, the "NC"
shall adopt such procedures and policies as it sees fit to carry out its
responsibility for the management of the consensus building process of the
DNSO, including the designation of such research or drafting committees,
working groups and other bodies of the GA as it determines appropriate to
carry out the substantive work of the DNSO."  Therefore, I believe it would
be inappropriate for Milton to be participating at this stage.  

Fellow, NCR's, am I missing something here?  


Caroline

-----Original Message-----
From: Shapiro, Ted [mailto:Ted_Shapiro@MPAA.org]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2000 2:15 AM
To: 'KathrynKL@aol.com'; Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com
Cc: mueller@syr.edu; 'Chicoine, Caroline'
Subject: RE: NC's UDRP WG 


Dear Kathryn,

Nothing has moved on this that's why you haven't seen anything yet. I will
send a draft of the proposal for your review/input (once completed but
before it goes to the full NC). I don't know if it will be working group or
some kind of monitoring task force (made up of a limited number of
representatives of the various interests-probably NC reps) which at a
certain point (like after a year of monitoring and compiling info) would
suggest to the NC that a new working group be formed to consider changes to
the UDRP. I was also thinking that we would get a law school to volunteer
for some of the heavy lifting. Amadeu has offered his students but we could
open this up and then let the NC choose.

Best regards, TED

-----Original Message-----
From: KathrynKL@aol.com [mailto:KathrynKL@aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2000 9:31 PM
To: Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com; Ted_Shapiro@mpaa.org
Cc: mueller@syr.edu
Subject: NC's UDRP WG 


Ted and Theresa:
Happy New Year!

Just a reminder to let you know that Milton Mueller and I will be joining
you 
in devising a WG to review the UDRP process.  Milton notes that he 
volunteered the NCDNHC for this Names Council group in Los Angeles, so we 
were a bit surprised when you did not contact us for input or to discuss the

delay being sought in making recommendations to the NC.

We trust that that lines of commuication are now open, and look forward to 
working with you.

Kathy Kleiman and Milton Mueller