RE: [council] Re: NC's UDRP WG

[Raúl Echeberría <raul@inia.org.uy>]

At 16:13 04/01/00 +0100, Shapiro, Ted wrote:
>I had no problem with Milton sitting in at LA (as you pointed out there is
>already ample precedent for this-the IPC has done this and will probably do
>so in future). NC members have busy day jobs and may not always be available
>or can't travel etc. However, if every constituency defines alternatives,
>proxies, mediums in a different fashion and scope, is there a risk of
>confusion? 

I don't see any risk. Independence of each constituency is more important.




Raul Echeberria
raul@inia.org.uy