[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[council] ICANN Comment Concerning Trailing-Hyphen Domain Names
To the Names Council:
You may have recently seen comments in the media and
on the lists regarding mistaken registration of .com/.net/.org
domain names having second-level labels with trailing hyphens.
ICANN staff has prepared the following comment on this issue,
which may be of interest to the Names Council.
Louis Touton
ICANN Vice President and General Counsel
=========================================
Comment Concerning Trailing-Hyphen Domain Names
(7 January 2000)
Since the implementation of the Internet domain-name system
in the 1980s, the specifications published and implemented
by the Internet community have not permitted labels making
up domain names to have trailing hyphens (e.g., "example-.com").
Througout this period, the specifications for the format
of domain names have been well-known throughout the Internet
technical community. They have been set forth in several RFCs,
including RFC 1035 (published in 1987) and RFC 1123 (published
in 1989). The commonly accepted specifications are reflected
in the functional specification for the Shared Registry System,
through which competitive registrar services were introduced
in the .com/.net/.org top-level domains last year, which
requires that labels end with letters or digits, not hyphens.
In the past several weeks, however, over 800 domain names
with labels containing trailing hyphens were registered
by mistake in the .com/.net/.org registry. These names
do not conform to the the functional specification
under which the .com/.net/.org registry is operated.
The registry software in use before January 3, 2000, however,
permitted registrars to enter these malformatted names into
the registry, and some registrars' software similarly
failed to screen out requests to register these names.
Promptly upon learning that these names had been
registered, the registry operator (NSI-Registry) revised
the software to reject additional requests to register
names of this format.
ICANN supports these corrections to maintain the stability
of the Internet. At the ICANN annual meeting on November 4,
1999, the ICANN Board approved a package of agreements
among NSI, ICANN, the United States Department of Commerce,
and the ICANN-accredited registrars. Those agreements
require any names that are registered to comply with the
format specified in the registry's functional specification.
They also provide that those registering domain names must
agree to cancellation of the registration in the event
of a registry or registrar mistake, and in the case of
every one of the trailing-hyphen names the registering
party did in fact have such an agreement.
The use of domain names in this noncompliant format
presents interoperability problems. The documented
format is well-known throughout the Internet technical
community. Among other things, domain names that
violate this format have the potential of causing
software written in reliance on these formats to
malfunction, and several instances of actual
malfunctions have been identified.
The U.S. Government's Statement of Policy on the
Management of Internet Names and Addresses, 63 Fed.
Reg. 31741 (June 10, 1998) (commonly known as the
"White Paper") specifies that preserving the stability
of the Internet should be the first priority of any
DNS management system. A second principle that the
White Paper states should guide DNS-management
activities is the promotion of competition in the
provision of registration services.
After consultation among ICANN, NSI-Registry, and
the registrars involved, notices have been given to
the registering parties that these names were accepted
and registered by mistake and will be cancelled.
These cancellations reflect implementation of
longstanding policy, rather than adoption of any
new policy. ICANN commends NSI-Registry and the
registrars involved for working constructively
within the competitive framework adopted at the
March and November 1999 ICANN meetings to
effectively and promptly address this challenge
to Internet stability. This sort of commitment
to stability and competition will continue and
expand the many public benefits the Internet
has brought.