[council] Constituency Outreach Status

["YJ Park" <yjpark@aptld.org>]

Dear Chicoine and all,

I appreciate your consideration on WG-E.
The summary would be circulated until Monday upon the request.

One more thing on WG-E issues which should be dealt with by all the constituencies, "OUTREACH".

Prior to the summary, I would like to know what's the status of each constituency's outreach development.

For example, we, NCDNHC have finally reached well-balanced those "FIVE" regions within our group very recently. 
Roughly speaking, ratio-wise, 20: 25: 20: 25: 20. 

As we have always emphasized that this balanced structure within the ICANN is really critical matter to reflect all the stakers' voices. 

Could you let me know each constitunecy's efforts and results?
This would be of great help for me to submit small summary.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Regards,

YJ


> I think I had a section for WGD (Theresa could you prepare a summary and
> email to group by Monday?)  and I will add a section for WGE and ask Y.J.
> whether she can prepare a summary and email it to the group on Monday?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raul Echeberria [mailto:raul@inia.org.uy]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 9:23 AM
> To: council@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [council] Next Names Council Teleconference
> 
> 
> At 09:01 08/02/00 -0600, Chicoine, Caroline wrote:
> >In my proposed agenda, I thought I included your suggestion by asking
> >Kathy/Philip to provide a summary for WGB for Monday and that I would
> >prepare a summary for WGC by Monday so that people could reflect and we
> >could have an educated discussion in our conference call.  Were you
> >contemplating something more/different than this?  Please let me know so I
> >can make any adjustments.
> 
> A report from the 4 WG's Chairs (not only B and C) with no more than 200
> words (as proposed by Philip) would be excellent.
> 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> 
> Raul Echeberria
> raul@inia.org.uy
>