[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [council] IANA Report on the .pn Top-Level Domain

To: "DNSO Names Council" <council@dnso.org>
Subject: Re: [council] IANA Report on the .pn Top-Level Domain
From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 09:07:26 +0100
Cc: "Andrew McLaughlin" <mclaughlin@pobox.com>, "Louis Touton" <touton@icann.org>
Sender: owner-council@dnso.org

In reply to Erica's posting,
I have no problems with the ICANN decision on the Pitcairn Island ccTLD.
Nor really with the fact this was an exercise of existing policy. I do not
feel the need for the NC to have been consulted.

If a future such decision would mean a policy change then I would insist on
the NC being consulted.

Philip.

Philip Sheppard
AIM - European Brands Association
9  av. des Gaulois  B-1040 Brussels
Tel +322 736 0305 Fax +322 734 6702

Prev by Date: RE: [council] Teleconference on Friday
Next by Date: [council] Cairo schedules for DNSO NC, GA, and constituencies
Prev by thread: RE: [cctld-discuss] Re: [council] IANA Report on the .pnTop-LevelDomain
Next by thread: [council] WG-E Report
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread