RE: [council] Proxy

[HiroHOTTA <h.hotta@hco.ntt.co.jp>]

I also suooprt this approach.

Hiro

At 00/03/02 09:00, owner-council@dnso.org wrote:
> I agree and support this approach.
> 
> Theresa
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	owner-council@dnso.org [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org] On Behalf Of
> Chicoine, Caroline
> Sent:	Wednesday, March 01, 2000 12:16 PM
> To:	'mclaughlin@pobox.com'; council@dnso.org
> Cc:	Louis L. Touton; Joe Sims
> Subject:	RE: [council] Proxy
> 
> I personally feel that each NC member from a Constituency represents the
> Constituency as a whole and not the organization from which he or she was
> nominated.  I also think that now that "permanent" NC Members are in place,
> we all need to focus on being active NC members.  As a result, I would
> prefer that proxies for an NC member be given to one of the remaining NC
> members.  The only exception I see needed is obviously for the gTLDS'
> Constituency.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew McLaughlin [mailto:mclaughlin@pobox.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 10:28 AM
> To: council@dnso.org
> Cc: Louis L. Touton; Joe Sims
> Subject: RE: [council] Proxy
> 
> 
> Dear Axel & NC members:
> 
> I should point out that the Names Council does not have any proxy mechanism
> in place which would allow non-NC members to participate in NC meetings.
> The NC could develop such a policy if it chooses, but has not done so.  The
> NC has several times allowed proxy voting through other members of the NC;
> and on one occasion (the election of ICANN Directors), the NC adopted a
> voting procedure that allowed non-NC members to cast proxy votes, pursuant
> to instructions from the missing member.  That procedure was specific to the
> election of ICANN Directors.
> 
> I have given similar advice to the Non-Commercial Constituency, which asked
> about the election of "alternate" members to the NC;  I advised that the NC
> doesn't have any policy in place which would allow non-NC alternates on a
> standing basis.  In general, it's my reading of the Bylaws that each
> constituency is allowed to elect only three NC representatives, not six
> (including alternates).
> 
> I hesitate to say that this is a matter that the NC ought to put on its
> agenda, because (in my view) there are a number of more important issues
> that the NC ought to make progress on before getting bogged down in
> proxy/alternate policies.  In any event, it's up to the NC to decide.
> 
> Sorry you won't be able to join us!  I'm in Cairo already, and the city is
> magnificent.
> 
> --Andrew
> 
>      -------------------------------------------------------------------
> andrew mclaughlin            |   c.f.o. and senior adviser
> internet corporation for assigned names and numbers
> <mclaughlin@icann.org>   |    <http://www.icann.org>
>      -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [ -----Original Message-----
> [ From: owner-council@dnso.org [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> [ aus der Muhlen, Axel
> [ Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 5:11 AM
> [ To: council@dnso.org
> [ Subject: [council] Proxy
> [ 
> [ 
> [ 
> [ 
> [ Dear Members of the Names Council,
> [ 
> [ I am unable to attend the upcoming meeting of the Names Council 
> [ in Cairo due
> [ to a previous engagement.  This message is to therefore advise you that I
> [ have given my proxy to Ted Shapiro, MPA-Brussels, to represent me at the
> [ Names Council meeting on 8 March 2000 in Cairo and to vote on my 
> [ behalf.  I
> [ hope to be able to attend the next meeting and look forward to 
> [ working with
> [ you all.
> [ 
> [ Axel aus der Muhlen 
> [ 
> [ 
> [ 
>  
----------
Hirofumi Hotta
R&D Strategy, NTT