[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [council] Agenda for the next NC telecon ? WG-C Report
With respect to the WGC Report, it was my undersatnding that it was going to
be published for public comment and then we would review and vote on it
(i.e. we would not be "accepting" anything on tomorrow's call). Ken, can
you clarify and can you send agenda asap. Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Jennings [mailto:Dennis.Jennings@ucd.ie]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 11:56 AM
To: Ken Stubbs
Cc: names council
Subject: [council] Agenda for the next NC telecon ? WG-C Report
Ken,
I can't remember seeing an Agenda - if one is available, I will try to give
my
views on key issues tonight.
WG-C Report: I presume that the NC will accept the WG-C Report and publish
it
immediately for comment for 4 weeks (as I understand we agreed in Cairo),
requesting substantive formal comments (as opposed to ad-hoc one liners)
which
will be reviewed by the NC and may be included in the NC submission to the
ICANN
Board.
Dennis
Ken Stubbs wrote:
>
> teleconf will be held on 31 march with :
>
> second option ... 8:30 u.s.
> 22:30 japan
> 23:30 melbourne
>
> the following teleconferences will be set up with a STRONG BIAS in time
> held towards the Pacific Rim
>
> ken
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@dninet.net>
> > To: Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@dninet.net>
> > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 8:31 AM
> > Subject: Fw: [council] Time for the next NC telecon
> >
> >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>
> > > To: <council@dnso.org>
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 12:34 PM
> > > Subject: [council] Time for the next NC telecon
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > The next NC telecon will be held on Friday March 31th,
> > > > i.e. during the difficult week as far as time zones are concerned.
> > > >
> > > > The infos I took from the http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/
are:
> > > > Santiago (Chile) -- DST ends March 12th 2000
> > > > Melbourne (Australia) -- DST ends March 25th 2000
> > > > Europe -- DST starts March 26th 2000
> > > > NorthAmerica (the part of USA, Canada and Mexico that observes
> > > > Daylight Saving Time) -- DST starts April 2th 2000
> > > >
> > > > Which means that during this only week (March 27-31) we are going
> > > > to have 7 hours difference between Europe and US East Coast
> > > > (instead of usual 6).
> > > > UTC+1+1DST in continental Europe
> > > > UTC-5+0DST on the US East Coast
> > > >
> > > > Ken called the NCtelecon for "14:30 CET (that is 08:30 us eastern
> > > > standard time)", we need to adjust, 14:30 CET is 07:30 US East.
> > > >
> > > > First option -- March 31th, 14:30 CET (12:30 UTC):
> > > > 7:30 US East Coast
> > > > 21:30 Japan/Korea
> > > > 22:30 Melbourne (Australia)
> > > > it is much better than expected for Erica, but more difficult for
> > > > US collegues (6:30 for Caroline in St Louis and 4:30 in California
> > > > for ICANN staff).
> > > >
> > > > Second option -- March 31th, 15:30 CET (13:30 UTC):
> > > > 8:30 US East Coast
> > > > 22:30 Japan/Korea
> > > > 23:30 Melbourne (Australia)
> > > > (7:30 for Caroline in St Louis and 5:30 in California
> > > > for ICANN staff).
> > > >
> > > > Ken, would you mind please take a decision between the two ?
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunatelly we do not have much choice, and we may consider
> > > > only two options for the subsequent NC telecon
> > > > (with the usual 6 hours difference between Europe and US East Coast,
> > > > no more time troubles until October)
> > > >
> > > > Option A
> > > > (9:00 US East Coast, 15:00 CET, 22:00 Japan/Korea, 23:00 Melbourne)
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Local time between April 2nd and October, 2000.
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 13:00
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > California, USA UTC-8+1DST 6:00
> > > > Missouri, USA UTC-6+1DST 8:00
> > > > Washington DC, USA (EST) UTC-5+1DST 9:00
> > > > Ottawa, Canada UTC-5+1DST 9:00
> > > > Santiago, Chile UTC-4+0DST 9:00
> > > > Montevideo, Uruguay UTC-3+0DST 10:00
> > > > Buenos Aires, Argentina UTC-3+0DST 10:00
> > > > Nouakchott, Mauritania UTC+0+0DST 13:00
> > > > Dublin, Ireland UTC+0+1DST 14:00
> > > > Brussels, Belgium (CET) UTC+1+1DST 15:00
> > > > Barcelona, Spain (CET) UTC+1+1DST 15:00
> > > > Madrid, Spain (CET) UTC+1+1DST 15:00
> > > > Frankfurt, Germany (CET) UTC+1+1DST 15:00
> > > > Paris, France (CET) UTC+1+1DST 15:00
> > > > Seoul, Korea UTC+9+0DST 22:00
> > > > Tokyo, Japan UTC+9+0DST 22:00
> > > > Melbourne, Australia UTC+10+0DST 23:00
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Option B
> > > > (17:00 US East Coast, 23:00 CET, 6:00 Japan/Korea, 7:00 Melbourne)
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Local time between April 2nd and October, 2000.
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 21:00
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > California, USA UTC-8+1DST 14:00
> > > > Missouri, USA UTC-6+1DST 16:00
> > > > Washington DC, USA (EST) UTC-5+1DST 17:00
> > > > Ottawa, Canada UTC-5+1DST 17:00
> > > > Santiago, Chile UTC-4+0DST 17:00
> > > > Montevideo, Uruguay UTC-3+0DST 18:00
> > > > Buenos Aires, Argentina UTC-3+0DST 18:00
> > > > Nouakchott, Mauritania UTC+0+0DST 21:00
> > > > Dublin, Ireland UTC+0+1DST 22:00
> > > > Brussels, Belgium (CET) UTC+1+1DST 23:00
> > > > Barcelona, Spain (CET) UTC+1+1DST 23:00
> > > > Madrid, Spain (CET) UTC+1+1DST 23:00
> > > > Frankfurt, Germany (CET) UTC+1+1DST 23:00
> > > > Paris, France (CET) UTC+1+1DST 23:00
> > > > Seoul, Korea UTC+9+0DST 6:00
> > > > Tokyo, Japan UTC+9+0DST 6:00
> > > > Melbourne, Australia UTC+10+0DST 7:00
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Elisabeth
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >