[council] BEFORE Clearer public notice

["YJ Park" <yjpark@aptld.org>]

Dear Michael, WG-B editor,

I asked Kathy to withdraw her comment especially regarding my story
which has NOT been consulted with me and even is NOT TRUE.

Since she has not done anything with this after she got my formal request,
I formally ask you AGAIN, the editor of this report, to take appropriate
action
before this whole report is going to be circulated among folks worldwide.

ASIA is not that stupid as somebody wishes.:-)

Regards,

YJ Park
Names Council of Non-commercial constituency of DNSO

[PS] I attached two messages.

====================================================
I. the message I sent to her personally yesterday
II. the message Kathy sent to this list after she received my message
====================================================

----- Original Message -----
From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@aptld.org>
To: <KathrynKL@aol.com>
Cc: "YJ Park" <yjpark@aptld.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 12:26 PM
Subject: [RESPONSIBILITY]If you were in my shoes, what will you do?

> I woke up 2 o'clock in the morning to read WG B report
> which you asked me to cooperate with, and I tried to make it
> until NC teleconfernece which was supposed to be held in 4:30.
>
> And I realized I have been described as silly as possible
> in your comment as the one who even couldn't change its position
> on my own and in an appropriate way.
>
> I've told you. It's NOT the case.
> I have kept repeating we have different situations between regions.
>
> You FORCED me to change my position but
> I still wanted to be nice to you and
> that's why I just kept saying abstain and didn't change my position
> intentionally.
>
> What I cannot understand is you didn't even consult with me
> while you dared to quote my name and distort my image world-wide.
>
> What would you do in the future?
> I want you to formally take down that part with apology.
>
> YJ
>

===========================================================

> Louis:
> I was just reviewing the website for the Formal Report of WG-B, and while
I
> see it posted at
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20000417.NCwgb-report.html, I
> do not see a place to submit comments.  I think for reasons of process, we
> need to make the current notice period as clear as possible.
>
> I would like to request that (1) the ICANN website clearly distinguish the
> two WG-B reports - one as the informal status report, and the other as the
> Formal Report, -- and point out that the current comment period is for the
> Formal Report.  (2) To help the public and the Names Council understand
and
> review the comments, comments to the Formal Report must be in a separate
> file.  (We saw a merger of two rounds of the UDRP comments over the summer
> and it was extremely confusing to follow).
>
> Elizabeth:  Could we include a prominent posting on the DNSO.ORG page that
a
> New Public Notice Period has started, with a link to the ICANN Formal WG-B
> Report location.
>
> many thanks!
> Kathy
>