RE: [council] proposed schedule for november icann meeting

["aus der Muhlen, Axel" <Axel_ausderMuhlen@mpaa.org>]

Thanks.  I will join you for dinner.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Stubbs [mailto:kstubbs@revenue.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 5:49 AM
To: Paul M. Kane; YJ Park; roberto gaetano
Cc: mclaughlin@pobox.com; Elisabeth PORTENEUVE; Dany Vandromme; Louis
Touton; names council; Mike Roberts; John Crain
Subject: [council] proposed schedule for november icann meeting


i have been informed that due to a special meeting which has been called
between icann -iana and the country code administrators, we have been asked
to revise our meeting schedule for the november names council meeting. i
talked to louis yesterday and we discussed this tentative schedule

november 14th -tuesday 9am -noon -  general assembly
1pm thru 4 pm -names council

i am also proposing another names council dinner on the previous night
(monday november 13th) at approx 7:30 at the chart house restaurant in
marina del rey (6 minutes from hotel) and have made tentative reservations
for same

i would appreciate your comments as soon as possible, both on the proposed
schedule as well as your interest in attending the proposed dinner

thanks

ken

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul M. Kane" <Paul.Kane@reacto.com>
To: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
Cc: <mclaughlin@pobox.com>; "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@corenic.org>; "Elisabeth
PORTENEUVE" <Elisabeth.PORTENEUVE@cetp.ipsl.fr>; "Dany Vandromme"
<vandrome@renater.fr>; "Louis Touton" <touton@icann.org>; "names council"
<council@dnso.org>; "roberto gaetano" <R.Gaetano@iaea.org>; "Mike Roberts"
<mmr@darwin.ptvy.ca.us>; "John Crain" <crain@icann.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: [council] names council teleconference thurdsay 21 september


> Morning YJ / all
>
> Thank you for the opportunity to clarify any confusion ......
>
> We need a costing and I have asked John Crain for the price for the
> Webcasting. NSI have kindly agreed to sponsor the web cast SUBJECT to
> obtaining an acceptable costing from ICANN/Berkman. If the costs are
> toooooo great we will need additional sponsors and your offer of
> assistance is most appreciated YJ. I hope John will be able to come back
> to us/Roger within a day or two so we can put this issue to behind us.
> Thanks Roger for helping out.....
>
> For future meetings it may be a good idea to set-up a "fund" for remote
> participation costs so we don't have this predicament at each
> meeting....
>
> As for the room allocation. I have volunteered to be the liaison.....
>
> Would EACH constituency please advise me of the capacity of the room,
> whether they prefer morning or afternoon, the expected duration (eg. ??
> hours) for their constituency meeting and any "special" facilities
> required by their constituency for the meeting.
>
> Thanks for your help
>
> Best
>
> Paul
>
> YJ Park wrote:
>
> > Andrew and NC members,
> >
> > > Please see my attached email of 17 September, which repeats *two*
earlier
> > > requests that the Names Council urgently decide (1) whether to webcast
the
> > > LA DNSO meetings, and, if so, how to pay for it;  and (2) the schedule
for
> > > the LA meetings, and the identity of the scheduling contact.
> >
> > I have been a bit confused on whether web cast issue was going to be
> > discussed
> > in the budget committee rather than nc as a whole during the
teleconference.
> > Since this was tabled due to lack of time, we'd better start to clarify
each
> > member's
> >
> > (1) yes and no to webcast the LA dnso meetings
> >      if it turns out yes, let's suggest how to pay for it.
> >
> > (2) schedule for the LA meetings and the identity of the scheduling
contact.
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > YJ Park, Non-commercial Constituency
> >
> > (1) Yes.
> >       If it is going to be paid by donation by the companies, I will try
to
> > raise fund
> >       among companies in asia area asap. I prefer this option.
> >       And if it is going to be paid by each constituency, ncc is going
to
> > try to share it.
> >
> > (2) I'm going to contact John and Paul as ncc contact point within 24
hrs.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > > If the Names Council does not tomorrow make those decisions, I will
assume
> > > that the DNSO will not be meeting in LA, and that no webcast should be
> > > arranged.
> >
> > Hope it's not too late.
> >
> > As I proposed a teleconference on Otc. 5 in the review-committee,
> > another brief teleconference, 20 mins asap might be an option to wrap
this
> > up.
> >
> > Let's wind this up asap.
> >
> > YJ
> >
> > > --Andrew
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-council@dnso.org [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org]On Behalf
Of
> > Ken
> > > Stubbs
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 10:40 PM
> > > To: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE; Dany Vandromme; Andrew McLaughlin; Louis
Touton;
> > > names council
> > > Cc: roberto gaetano; Mike Roberts
> > > Subject: [council] names council teleconference thurdsay 21 september
> > >
> > >
> > > for some reason the names council teleconference which is scheduled
for
> > > tomorrow has not been posted by elisabeth so here goes
> > >
> > > date: thurdsay september 21, 2000
> > > time: 08:00 usa eastern time 14:00 cet
> > >
> > > telephone number
> > >
> > > Then the dial number will be +33-1-41-74-78-83
> > > No passcode is required
> > >
> > > agenda items:
> > >
> > > approval of prior meetings minutes
> > > budget workgroup report roger & erica
> > > dnso review report- theresa
> > > financial report from icann staff
> > > icann staff report
> > > for status on independent  review panel nominations.
> > > proxy voting proposal - paul kane
> > > business constituancy dues problem
> > > intake committee report
> > > discussion regarding individual outreach and representation
> > >
> > > we have a lot to accomplish here and i plan on starting the conference
on
> > > time...
> > >
> > > repeat.... 08:00 usa eastern time 14:00 CET thursday 21 september
> > >
> > > see you on the call..
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >