<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Fw: draft - comment Re: [council] NCtelecon 21 September 2000, minutes
fellow members
first of all ... let me say that my memory and recollections are EXACTLY in
line with Philips.
secondly... let me express my concern that an impression may be forming in
my mind that the minutes (as originally presented) and comments attributed
appear
to lack the "independent perspective" i would expect to see from someone
who
has taken that task on.
it is essential that the preceedings of this council be recorded exactly as
they occur and in the order in which they occur. their can be no room for
independent perspectives or interpretations here and, frankly,i feel, that
is what
has occured recently. to that end it has become quite clear that it would
be
a good idea to "tape" all the future names council sessions for reference.
i am proposing that, from now on, all names council meetings be taped
and will
personally arrange to do so for the next teleconference until a methodology
can be finalized.l
we have to provide a procedure to insure that this kind of situation with
all of its
attendant frustration does not occur again..
i hope you all feel as i do on this matter
best wishes
ken
----- Original Message -----
> From: <cchicoine@dkwlaw.com>
> To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
> Cc: <council@dnso.org>; "Elisabeth Porteneuve"
> <"Elisabeth.Porteneuve,_owner-council"@dnso.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 9:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [council] NCtelecon 21 September 2000, minutes
>
>
> >
> > I have to agree that my understanding is the same as Philip.
> >
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|