Re: [council] The relations between DNSO and ASO?

[kstubbs@digitel.net (Digitel - Ken Stubbs)]

I look forward to receiving your report YJ and your suggestion is a very
good one

I strongly hope that the other SO's adopt the same attitude towards the DNSO
as well

ken stubbs

----- Original Message -----
From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
To: <council@dnso.org>
Cc: <Woeber@CC.UniVie.ac.at>; <hph@online.no>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 5:50 AM
Subject: [council] The relations between DNSO and ASO?


> Hello council members,
>
> Let me update and make a suggestion on the relations between
> Names Council and Address Council.
>
> There was a Address Council Workshop in Brisbane on 28 and 29
> - invitation only workshop - after APNIC meeting where I attended
> as an informal observer from Names Council on 28 morning session.
> The main discussion focuesd on the AC roles and global policy vs
> regional policy issues.
>
> As I noted in the DNSO review paper, there should be more
> communications among SOs since many issues are co-related
> and need collaborative advices from different SOs.
>
> We also have to remind that even the role of NC is not clearly
> defined yet, either. We are still in the situations where every NC
> member has his/her own understanding on the roles which seems
> to be changeable according to diverse situations.
>
> It was first questioned to me by Wilfried Woeber prior to workshop
> whether this would be a precedent for our continous mutual efforts
> between DNSO and ASO or one-time case.
>
> As one of DNSO review committee member as well as one who
> suggested more communications among SOs be desirable, I explicitedly
> noted it is within the capacity of DNSO review committee which covers
> the co-relations between DNSO and ASO.
>
> I therefore express here that I want to carry on this responsibility
> as a member of DNSO review committee and a short report will
> be distributed soon based upon its minutes.
>
> YJ
>