Re: [council] [Clarification] Review Working Group

["Erica Roberts" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>]

Hi YJ,
I'm pleased to hear you're back on deck and helping to clarify this issue.!
I would like to see an early result from your group (wouldn't we all!) and
you are clearly working toward this.  However, I think it would be useful
for you to have approval by the NC of proposed terms of reference and
timeframe - maybe we could finalise this at our next teleconf?  What is your
view?

erica
----- Original Message -----
From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
To: <council@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2000 8:27 AM
Subject: [council] [Clarification] Review Working Group


> Hello Caroline, Peter, Erica, Dany and all,
>
> Sorries for my belated response this time. After MdR meeting,
> I have been worn out and it took quite time to come back.:-)
>
> In MdR, Ken and I talked about this a bit more and agreed that
> the details of this "Review Working Group" should be elaborated
> by myself and finalized.
>
> Let me briefly describe right now and more detailed plans are
> expected to be developed within the Working Group later.
>
> 1) how Review Working Group is composed of
> 2) the Scope of Review WG
> 3) Timeframe of Review WG and
> 4) how this group is going to work with Review TF and NC.
>
> =======================
> Review Working Group, WG F
> =======================
>
> 1. Call for participation through 7 constituencies and GA
>
> Hope this WG can be inclusive as much as posible for the balanced
> recommendations.
>
> Call for election for co-working group chair among members
> as soon as this group is in place.
>
> 2. Scope of WG
>
> 1st Stage: This Working Group can start from answering to the Review
>                 TF's questionaire which was presented to the Board.
>
> 2 nd Stage: Call for DNSO recommendation paper.
>
> 3 rd Stage: Take a voting process to adopt the WG's position paper
>                   which will be presented to the NC.
>
> 3. Timeframe of Review WG
>
> Nov. 27 - open end : Call for Participation in this WG
> Dec. 4 : WG Charter Discussion
> Dec. 11 : WG Charter Finalization
> Dec. 11 - Jan.? : WG's Interim Report during Jan's NC teleconference
> Jan.?  - Feb ? : WG's Interim Report during Feb's NC teleconference
> March Melbourne Meeting: Submission to NC as WG's position
>                                            under assumption that it can
find
> consensus.
>
> 4. The relationship with Review TF and NC
>
> Review WG and Review TF and NC:
>
> Since WG is within DNSO and TF is within NC, it is desirable
> for two groups to exchange views and info to achieve their goals
> as each input channel to NC and and advisory body to the NC.
> ==========================================
>
> If you have any comment on this, please do so.
> If we can reach an agreement as soon as possible, as it is put here,
> this WG can start from Nov. 27.
>
> Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
> YJ
>