Re: [council] Input for the NC agenda

[Dany Vandromme <vandrome@renater.fr>]

>Fellow NC members:
>
>I have been innundated by e-mails and telephone requests from the media
>asking about our (ICANN) "official response" to the Fromkin report, as
>presented in the Duke University Law Review. That report raises the question
>of the legality of ICANN vis a vis US law and policy.
>
>
>I would suggest that we (the NC) petition the Board to direct the ICANN
>staff to prepare an "Official statement" on the subject, so that, when and
>if asked, we can all "sing to the same music".
>
>Peter de Blanc

I support Peter proposal asking for clarification made formally by ICANN staff.

Furthermore, I would like to have on the Dec 19th NC meeting a point 
for the creation/approval of the DNSO review working group, as 
suggested by YJ. That point needs also a straight fixing, without any 
further delay.
I even encourage YJ to start working on that right away. Based on the 
existing experience of earlier working group, it may be possible to 
have a WG charter for approval at the NC next meeting.

Yours
Dany

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER

Reseau National pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche

                                   |  ENSAM
Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr |  FRANCE
--------------------------------------------------------------------