DNSO Archives: [council]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Re: Proposed Review WG

To: "DNSO Council $Public archive$" <council@dnso.org>
Subject: [council] Re: Proposed Review WG
From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 15:41:52 +0100
Organization: AIM
References: <01f901c059f7$86b24c80$6501a8c0@aim.be> <014c01c059fe$667542e0$22169cca@yjpark2>
Sender: owner-council@dnso.org

thanks for clarifying that you propose the Review WG will START by answering the NC Review Task force questionnaire. You intend to do more.

In that case the terms of reference you propose are incomplete. In stage 2 and 3 you describe a process but not an objective. What else exactly do you propose the Review WG seeks to achieve ? Please clarify.

Philip.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [council] Re: Proposed Review WG
  - From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>

References:
- [council] Proposed Review WG
  - From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
- [council] Re: Proposed Review WG
  - From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>