RE: Re: [council] Review Working Group

[Theresa Swinehart <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>]

Hi --

I'm confused to be quite honest about what we're trying to decide here. Can
someone please clarify? What I understand is that YJ was asked to chair a
working group per Caroline's motion. That working group is to address some
issues related to YJ's document she circulated to the NC list before the LA
meeting.

The other matter is to have a working group related to the DNSO review,
where my suggestion was in LA that there be a listserve set up under the GA.
Roger agreed with this, then it appeared that the discussion got sidetracked
to the issue of Caroline's motion, and we never resolved the DNSO working
group matter.

If my understanding is correct, then I make the following suggestion for the
two seperate matters at hand: 1) We immediately get clarification of
Caroline's motion and the working group attached to it. 2) A listserve under
the GA is set up for the DNSO review working group, which there is a large
interest in, and needs to be established. I'd suggest that Roberto, as
liason to the DNSO review task force, act as chair of that group, and
liasons with YJ's group on matters that may address the dnso review.

We need to move on this, and unless we get clarification on the motion for
YJ's working group, I'm afraid we'll never get it started, and the DNSO
review working group will never formally be underway and get the input into.


Thanks,

Theresa


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@dnso.org [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
Michael Chicoine
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 12:46 PM
To: Dany Vandromme; Peter de Blanc; council@dnso.org
Cc: YJ Park; Philip Sheppard
Subject: Re: Re: [council] Review Working Group


I disagree



------------------ Reply Separator --------------------
Originally From: Dany Vandromme <vandrome@renater.fr>
Subject: Re: [council] Review Working Group
Date: 12/02/2000 10:24pm


on 2/12/00 21:58, Peter de Blanc at pdeblanc@usvi.net wrote:

> Fellow NC members:
>
>
> A suggestion was made that the WG submit a "proposed charter" to the
NC for
> ratification prior to undertaking its work.
>
> I submit that it would be impossible to even gather ideas and
discuss such a
> charter, without an operating list for those persons who wish to, or
are
> willing to participate.
>
> Given the absence of any clear policy as may have been output by
working
> group "D", It seems that the only way to move forward with the YJ
WG-F is to
> turn on the list.
>
> The WG was voted upon and approved in a public meeting. Any delays
could
> provoke a negative public reaction.
>
> Does anyone on the council disagree with the necessity of activating
the
> list now?
>
> Peter de Blanc
>
-
I fully agree with the request to activate the list as soon as
possible, and
certainly before the NC meeting of December.
Dany
-
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER

                Reseau National de Telecommunications
         pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche

                                  |  ENSAM
Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr |  FRANCE
--------------------------------------------------------------------