ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Time of Nc calls


I feel most confortable with 4:00pm US East Coast, But I could accomodate with the initial suggested time.

Oscar Robles

On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Digitel - Ken Stubbs wrote:

> i have no problem with this schedule change but would appreciate input from
> other council members in the next 24 hours
>
> ken stubbs
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "aus der Muhlen, Axel" <Axel_ausderMuhlen@mpaa.org>
> To: "'Ken Stubbs'" <kstubbs@corenic.org>; "'Elisabeth Porteneuve'"
> <IMCEAMAILTO-Elisabeth+2EPorteneuve+40cetp+2Eipsl+2Efr@mpaa.org>
> Cc: <council@dnso.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 10:04 PM
> Subject: FW: [council] Time of Nc calls
>
>
> >
> > I, again, request that the next conference call on December 19 be
> scheduled
> > for 4:00 p.m. US East Coast.  As  indicated in my previous email,
> scheduling
> > the call for 4:00 p.m. US East Coast ensures that during Northern
> Hemisphere
> > winter time everybody is within the 06.00  - 23.00 window recommended by
> the
> > Intake Committee.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: aus der Muhlen, Axel
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 7:15 PM
> > To: 'Philip Sheppard'; council@dnso.org
> > Subject: RE: [council] Time of Nc calls
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I believe that can be achieved also during Northern Hemisphere winter
> time.
> > Note that I suggested to schedule the conference call for 4:00 p.m. US
> East
> > Coast, thus 1:00 p.m., not 6:00 a.m., California.
> >
> > If the conference call is scheduled for 4:00 p.m. US East Coast, the
> > corresponding local times would be as follows:
> >
> >                 California, USA                           1:00 p.m.
> >                 Missouri, USA                             3:00 p.m.
> >                 Monterrey, Mexico                      3:00 p.m.
> >                 Washington DC, USA                4:00 p.m.
> >                 St.Thomas, Virgin Islands          5:00 p.m.
> >                 Santiago, Chile                           6:00 p.m.
> >                 Buenos Aires, Argentina            6:00 p.m.
> >                 Nouakchott, Mauritania              9:00 p.m.
> >                 London, United Kingdom           9:00 p.m.
> >                 Brussels, Belgium                    10:00 p.m.
> >                 Barcelona, Spain                      10:00 p.m.
> >                 Frankfurt, Germany                   10:00 p.m.
> >                 Paris, France                             10:00 p.m.
> >                 Seoul, Korea                                6:00 a.m.
> >                 Tokyo, Japan                               6:00 a.m.
> >                 Melbourne, Australia                   8:00 a.m.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Philip Sheppard [ mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be
> > <mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be> ]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 3:36 AM
> > To: council@dnso.org
> > Subject: [council] Time of Nc calls
> >
> >
> > In reply to Axel's request to re schedule the NC call to a more socialble
> > hour in California (currently 5.00 am), Axel referred to the Intake
> > Committee suggestion in the report adopted by the NC that call should
> > ideally be scheduled to be no earlier than 06.00  and no later than 23.00
> in
> > any time zone.
> >
> > I am afraid to say that the Intake Committee was guilty of operating on
> > Northern Hemisphere summer time, where the 06.00 - 23.00 window is
> > achievable between California and Melbourne.
> >
> > Unfortunately the combination of winter time in the Northern Hemisphere
> and
> > Melbourne daylight saving time, means the window is wider in Northern
> > Hemisphere winter months. The consequence of shifting to 06.00 in
> California
> > is now 01.00 in Melbourne.
> >
> > I think the 06.00 - 23.00 window should indeed be an objective but clearly
> > we need to operate differently during some months of the year. Apologies
> > that the Intake Committee had not foreseen this problem earlier.
> >
> > Philip.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>