ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Review WG requests its progress report until Feb 20or March 4.


on 4/01/01 20:54, Peter de Blanc at pdeblanc@usvi.net wrote:

> 
> My vote is Feb 20 - this should leave enough time to prepare for march ICANN
> meeting.
>
-
I abstained to vote at the last teleconf, because (I repeatedly said that)
it was a non-sense to allow such a short time for a working group, whose
main motivation was to open the contributions and inputs for the review.

If the deadline can be postponed as Peter proposes, I am in favour of it.

We should be aware that the main concern should not to produce empty shells
on-time, but to supply ICANN with substantive contribution.

Dany
-
> peter
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@dnso.org [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> YJ Park
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 2:13 PM
> To: council@dnso.org
> Cc: wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: [council] Review WG requests its progress report until Feb 20
> or March 4.
> 
> 
> Hello NC members,
> 
> Hoping that you have had happy holidays - Christmas and
> New Year - I want to remind you of the concern expressed
> during NC's Dec teleconference that it would be almost
> "impossible" to come up with its final report until Jan. 15th
> which cannot reach proper consensus due to its limited time.
> 
> If this report is not based upon true-sense consensus process
> which needs enough consultations and enough chances to unfold
> different positions, dnso-review will be categorized as nominal
> or symbolic event prompted by Christmas mood.
> 
> Therefore, some WG members have proposed to extend its
> timeframe to NC, which has been confirmed by straw poll
> participants. Everybody participated in this poll agreed upon
> this request. There is a slight difference on the date between
> Feb 20 and March 4 which is under NC's discretion.
> 
> Appreciating WG members who have taken part in this group
> despite BIG holidays, I do request NC to reconsider Review
> WG can work with practical working days instead of around
> 10 -12 substantial days which is almost "impossible".
> 
> Thanks,
> YJ
> ==========================================
> [FYI] Straw Poll Result on WG Timeframe.
> 
> 20 members participated in this straw poll out of 145 subscribers
> - the number of subscribers to this list can be subject to change. -
> 2000. Dec. 30 - 2001. Jan. 1 for two full days during the holidays.
> 
> Option A, Feb 20 : 8
> Option B, March 4 : 10
> Option C: 2
> 
> "Greg Burton" <sidna@feedwriter.com>: Option A[ X ]
> "Bruce" <bmjames@swbell.net>: Option A[ X]
> "Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>: Option B[  x  ]
> "grumpy" <stonecottage@earthlink.net> : Option B[  x  ]
> "Jefsey Morfin" <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>: Option B[ X ]
> "Phil King" <yofelipe@excite.com>: Option A[  X  ]
> "Peter de Blanc": Option A
> <ZFASSETT@aol.com>: Option A[ X   ]
> "Clarence Donath" <mrdo@mrdo.com>: Option C[ X ]  Friday March 9, 2001
> "Chris McElroy" <watch-dog@inreach.com>: Option B[  X  ]
> "DPF" <david@farrar.com>: Option A[  X  ]
> "Milton Mueller" <mueller@syr.edu>: Option B[X ]
> <JessWest@aol.com>: Option A[ x   ]
> "Marcia Lynn" <marcialynn@att.net>: Option B[X ]
> "Sotiropoulos" <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>: Option B[X ]
> "Michael Bracker" <michael.bracker@gmx.net>: Option B[X]
> "J J Teernstra" <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>: Option B[ X   ]
> "Jonathan Weinberg" <weinberg@mail.msen.com>: Option A[X]
> "Roeland Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>: Option B[YES]
> "Michael Sondow" <msondow@iciiu.org>: Option C[ X ] When the
> WG has completed its
> work.
> ===========================================
> [End of Message]
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER

                Reseau National de Telecommunications
         pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche

                                  |  ENSAM
Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr |  FRANCE
--------------------------------------------------------------------




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>