----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 5:11
AM
Subject: [council] Communication on WG
review - ACTION PLEASE!
NC members,
As agreed last night this is the message I propose to
send on behalf of the NC to WG review. This is consistent with NC decision
D2 of 8 February 2001.
(I note since the NC meeting YJ Park has posted a personal
commentary and an older version of this to the WG review anyway. This is
regrettable, it makes for poor communication to the working group. It also
seems to be contrary to the spirit of collegiate agreement we seek to
achieve within the NC.)
So please let me have comments on this message within 24
hours. I would like to send this to WG review at 10.00 am Paris
time Wednesday 28 February.
Philip.
-----------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT MESSAGE FOR WORKING GROUP REVIEW
Future timetable for the
groups input
Status
1. The DNSO comment period on the draft DNSO
Review Report v. 2.0a ended
February 11th.
Next steps
2.
Comments submitted from WG Review and others has been incorporated
as
appropriate by the chair of the Names Council Review Task Force
(NCRTF) into
a draft version 3. NCRTF comprises one representative
from each of the
seven NC constituencies. Version 3 has been validated by
remaining members
of the NCRTF.
3. DNSO Review Report version 3
was received 18 February by the ICANN Board. This is in preparation for the
Board's meeting in March in Melbourne and to allow full time for an ICANN
public comment period.
4. As was mandated, the task of the Names
Council Review Task Force,
including a DNSO public comment period, is now
complete.
5. In order to ensure coherent input to the ICANN Board,
all further
comments from WG Review should be directed to the ICANN
public comment
website, when the ICANN public comment period
begins.
6. At the closure of the ICANN public comment period the task
of WG Review
will be complete.
Implementation
7. The Names
Council will be reviewing both the input from the final WG D
report and
from the Review process to develop a new process to implement
the
recommendations of the Review process. Full participation in
this
implementation phase is envisaged. It is understood that the
structure of
participation will be an improvement on the present
structure of DNSO
working groups!
Kind regards,
Theresa
Swinehart, Chair, DNSO Review Task Force
Philip Sheppard, NC
Chair
---------------------END-------------------------