[council] Re: Any (other) AoB issues for Melbourne???

["Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu>]

I encourage you all to discuss the proposed new Verisign agreement at Melbourne. 

But I still think it makes more sense to take up the matter formally and fully during the April 10 teleconference. Many members of our constituency are getting into airplanes and we have not had time to develop a coherent response to it. 

The April 1 decision deadline is an arbitrary one proposed by ICANN staff, I have not heard any reason why it can't be extended to April 11. 

>>> "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be> 03/05/01 04:30AM >>>
Paul and NC,
thanks for the prompt. It seems we should add under AOB for the NC agenda in
Melbourne:

1.  Verisign agreement
- policy aspects of dot org proposal
- id of other key policy issues
- role of NC

2. New registry contracts

3. Non ICANN TLDs
- id of key policy issue
- role of ISPs
- role of NC

Philip.