Fw: [council] Re: [wg-review] WG Review and the future review process

["Erica Roberts" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>]

In the email below, I was surprised by the signature block:
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> Working Chair, WG Review
I had been under the impression that Greg Burton was the Chair of the WG
Review and that YJ was the co-Chair responsible for liaison with the NC.
Can someone clarify for me the current position with regard to WG Review and
its Chairs.

erica
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sotiropoulos" <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
Cc: <wg-review@dnso.org>; "NC (list)" <council@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 5:48 AM
Subject: [council] Re: [wg-review] WG Review and the future review process


> Philip Sheppard wrote:
> >
> > Message to WG Review
> >
> > The work of WG Review has been greatly appreciated and the interest
> > expressed by Sotiris Sotiropoulos  to continue with the review process
is
> > also good news.
>
> Thank you for the encouraging words Philip, I am
> now more interested than ever in ensuring that the
> "bottom up" mandate of the ICANN is adhered to,
> and effectively represented in all forums, levels,
> and organizations that relate to its structure and
> function.
>
> > The execution of recommendations from the Review process is a part of
the NC
> > business plan and an interim group has been formed to recommend terms of
> > reference and means of outreach for this.
>
> Just a couple points of clarification, if you
> don't mind, Philip.
>
> Of course, you don't mean to say that the
> formation of the "interim group" to which you
> refer above, precludes the WG-Review from
> submitting its own proposal(s) as per Resolutions
> 01.28 & 01.29 of the BoD?
>
> Also, would you mind naming the members of the
> interim group, and directing those interested to
> their work in progress?  I, for one, would like to
> be party to such a discussion, and I'm sure many
> of the other Members of the WGr would also
> appreciate such an opportunity.
>
> > The work of the existing WG Review (whose terms of reference were to
> > contribute to the consulting phase of the review process) will come to a
> > close 16 April.
>
> Thank you for confirming the deadline date.  This
> certainly underlines the urgency in getting the
> WGr's proposal(s) to the BoD on time.
>
> >At this date the list will close and subscribers will be
> > transferred to the GA Announce list as is usual practice. General
discussion
> > will continue on the main GA list.
> >
> > In addition, individuals who are keen to do more will soon see a new
> > opportunity for this. Opportunities to contribute to issues relevant to
the
> > NC as its exists today and a longer term restructuring will be separate.
>
> One more clarification: Does the last sentence
> mean that those "individuals who are keen to do
> more" will not have the opportunity "to contribute
> to issues relevant to the NC as its exists today
> and a longer term restructuring"?  Forgive me for
> asking, but I would like to make sure nobody
> misunderstands this final point, as it appears
> somewhat ambivalent.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> Working Chair, WG Review
>