[council] Re: I NOTICED THAT MY POSTING TO THE NAMES COUNCIL WAS NOT DISTRIBUTE D

[Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>]

> From RCochetti@verisign.com Mon Mar 26 02:02 MET 2001
> 
> Phillip/Elizabeth-
> 
> Could you look into why the gTLD Constituency comment to the Names Council
> was not posted?  Evidently, it was not delivered to Phillip either (see
> notice below)?  

==> Roger,

    Your message has been delivered, as you may see in archives
    http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc05/msg00042.html

    The attached Delivery-Reports indicate that *personnal Philip's
    email <philip.sheppard@europe.com>* has temporary problem,,
    see last few lines on this message.
    I trust his professional email is OK, and he will read all postings
    once the business hours start in Europe (in one hour).

    No problem with email over last weekend, I have been supervising
    by myself.

    Best,
    Elisabeth

> 
> Anyway, I am attaching and re-sending it in hopes that it will be posted.
> 
> Roger  
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Mail Delivery Subsystem [mailto:MAILER-DAEMON@verisign.com] 
> Sent:	Sunday, March 25, 2001 1:16 PM
> To:	RCochetti@verisign.com
> Subject:	Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours
> 
>  <<ATT494502.TXT>>  <<gTLD CONSTITUENCY INPUT ON PROPOSED VERISIGN ICANN
> AGREEMENT>>    **********************************************
> **      THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY      **
> **  YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE  **
>     **********************************************
> 
> The original message was received at Sun, 25 Mar 2001 09:00:34 -0500 (EST)
> from rdex01-node1.prod.netsol.com [10.131.4.28]
> ----- The following addresses had transient non-fatal errors -----
> <philip.sheppard@europe.com>
> ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> <philip.sheppard@europe.com>... Deferred: Connection refused by
> mail-intake-3.mail.com.
> Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours
> Will keep trying until message is 5 days old
>