Re: [council] Fw: your proposal - consultation periods

["Erica Roberts" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>]

Thanks Oscar - I agree with you but I guess I am aiming here at a statement
of principle.  It will neeed to be fleshed out in due course in, for
example, a standard operating Procedures (SOP) which detail the consultative
process.  However, it will clearly take some time to develop and get
agreement to a SOP and, in the meantime, a statement of relevant principles
would be helpful.

erica
----- Original Message -----
From: "Oscar A. Robles Garay" <orobles@nic.mx>
To: "Erica Roberts" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>
Cc: <council@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2001 12:21 AM
Subject: Re: [council] Fw: your proposal - consultation periods


> Erica,
> We should define the term "reasonable", I would suggest two kinds of
periods, depending of the topic: policy and not policy issues.
> I don't have clear enough the time needed for a proper input.
>
> Oscar
>
> > The NC resolves that:
> > 1. The NC encourages the Board and ICANN staff to  ensure that
reasonable time is allowed in future for constituencies to consider issues
and to resolve differences;
> >
> > 2. The NC requests the Board to match the Verisign offer to provide
$100,000 to fund DNSO/NC secretariat support.
> >
> > Proposed: Erica Roberts
> > Seconded: Peter de Blanc
> >
> >
>
>