RE: [council] List administration

["Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net>]

ok, in that case i agree- close down the one no one uses, and leave the one
people actually use ( ga@dnso.org )

But - do NOT close down the one with all the traffic! ( ga@dnso.org )


peter de Blanc

-----Original Message-----
From: Milton Mueller [mailto:Mueller@syr.edu]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 2:45 PM
To: pdeblanc@usvi.net
Subject: RE: [council] List administration


That's the "restricted" one.
Users have voted with their feet and abandoned the unrestricted one.
So we may as well close it down.

>>> "Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net> 05/21/01 01:38PM >>>
The list i am referring to is ga@dnso.org

Which one is that? the "restricted one"? or "the non-restricted one"?

peter

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@dnso.org [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
Chicoine, Caroline G.
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:27 AM
To: 'Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales'; council@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [council] List administration


Costs was one of the factors, but I believe the numbers show thaat the full
list usage is negligible compared to the restricted list.  Elisabeth can you
shed light?
http://www.sdnp.org.pa