[council] RFP-DNSO Problem

[Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>]

Colleagues,

I am receiving this message from Ian Peter, without getting
any prior notification from the NC or the NC-Budget Committee.

I am very surprise to see such change in the middle of process,
and would appreciate to have the NC clarifications.

Elisabeth Porteneuve
--

> From ipeter@bigpond.net.au Wed Jun 20 11:42 MET 2001
> Message-ID: <00cc01c0f96e$3090f920$0200a8c0@qld.bigpond.net.au>
> From: "Ian Peter" <ipeter@bigpond.net.au>
> To: "Elisabeth Porteneuve" <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>
> Subject: DNSO RFP
> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:48:41 +1000
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
> 
> Please note that a 72 hour extension until midnight GMT on Saturday, June 23
> has been granted for responses to the DNSO Request for Proposal.
> 
> If you have already submitted a response and would like the extra time to
> revise it, please feel free to do so.
> 
> If you have not submitted your response yet, you should feel free to take
> advantage of the time extension.
> 
> Under no circumstances will further time extensions be granted.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> 
> Ian Peter
> 
> 
>