<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Draft rules for non NCmembers
Paul
I had exactly the same thought, a minimum of two from two different
Constituencies shouldn't prove to onerous and would add credibility to the
group.
Tony
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul M. Kane [SMTP:Paul.Kane@reacto.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 10:39 AM
> To: Philip Sheppard
> Cc: NC (list)
> Subject: Re: [council] Draft rules for non NCmembers
>
> Just another thought...
> Might I suggest f) be clarified to ensure a min of two NC members. One
> of whom will be the Chair.
> I think it makes for better communication to the NC.
>
> I am assuming the TF will have a mailing list that will be archived so
> those wishing to review dialogue may do so.
>
> best
>
> Paul
>
> > Philip Sheppard wrote:
> >
> > Thank you Erica for first comments on the draft rules for non NC
> > member participation. I have incorporated these comments below.
> > Comments please by Thursday 5 July.
> > Philip
> >
> > [start draft ]
> >
> > 3. NC committees and task forces
> >
> > From time to time the NC may form sub-groups. These are typically of
> > three types. Each type may form small further sub-groups from within
> > their membership. The chair of an interim committee, committee or task
> > force is appointed by the NC. In the case of a task force the NC
> > typically chooses to ratify the election of a chair by the task force
> > itself.
> >
> > Interim committee ? a preparatory group of around 3-5 NC members
> > charged with turning an idea into a proposed action plan. The interim
> > committee is dissolved following NC adoption of the action plan.
> >
> > Committee ? a small group of around 3-5 NC members of which has
> > typically been delegated a limited authority from the NC.
> >
> > Task Force ? a group equally representative of each NC constituency
> > (typically one from each) and typically charged with forming a
> > recommendation to the NC or implementing an agreed NC action plan. A
> > task force may comprise NC members and/or nominees from outside of the
> > NC provided that:
> >
> > a) the nominee is nominated by a member of the NC
> >
> > b) the nominee has the support of the three NC members of the
> > constituency
> >
> > c) the nominee is a member of the nominees? constituency
> >
> > d) the nominee is not also a member of the same ICANN-relevant
> > organisation as an NC member on the task force, the NC member taking
> > priority at any time
> >
> > e) no two nominees are members of the same ICANN-relevant
> > organisation, the first nominee taking priority
> >
> > f) there is at least one NC member of the task force
> >
> > g) the chair of the task force is an NC member.
> >
> > Note: An ICANN-relevant organisation is defined as one that any NC
> > member considers to be ICANN-relevant.
> >
> > Working group. In addition to the above groups the NC will from time
> > to time form a DNSO working group (WG) with a membership open to all
> > DNSO participants. The WG objective is to formulate positions on
> > policies, facilitate the development of consensus support for policies
> > and to produce a report to the NC highlighting these positions and
> > level of support. See the separate Procedures for Working Groups for
> > full detail [in preparation].
> >
> > [end draft]
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|