[council] Dealing with bounced and returned mail

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

Dear DNSO Secretariat

I understand from Philip Sheppard that the DNSO Secretariat is responsible
for processing bounced and returned mails.  Until now, I have assumed that
task.

As there is a great deal of work reposting mails, writing to people etc., I
have tried to ask that these tasks be automated.  You tell me this is cannot
be done using Majordomo.

Since we seem not to be achieving a satisfactory resilution privately, I
will now ask that all mail between us be copied to the GA and Names Council
mailing lists.

Could you please advise what you see as the difficulty in automatically
returning mail such as that from Milton Mueller below, to the sender?

Perhaps the experts on these lists can propose a solution.

Best regards
Patrick Corliss

----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Corliss <patrick@quad.net.au>
To: Milton Mueller <mueller@syracuse.edu>
Cc: [ga-udrp] <ga-udrp@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 8:16 AM
Subject: Fw: Non-member submission from ["Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu>]


> ----- Original Message -----
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 2:31 AM
> Subject: BOUNCE ga-udrp@dnso.org: Non-member submission from ["Milton
> Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu>]
>
>
> > >From ga-udrp-listadmin@dnso.dnso.org  Mon Jul  2 18:31:39 2001
> > Received: from gwia201.syr.edu (gwia201.syr.edu [128.230.248.25])
> > by dnso.dnso.org (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id SAA15509
> > for <ga-udrp@dnso.org>; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 18:31:38 +0200 (MET DST)
> > Received: from MTA2-Message_Server by gwia201.syr.edu
> > with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 02 Jul 2001 12:31:35 -0400
> > Message-Id: <sb4069a7.045@gwia201.syr.edu>
> > X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.5.1
> > Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 12:31:10 -0400
> > From: "Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu>
> > To: <ga-udrp@dnso.org>, <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
> > Cc: <mcade@att.com>, <wsl@cerebalaw.com>, <icann-board@icann.org>,
> >         <process2@listbox.wipo.int>
> > Subject: RE: [process2] Re: [ga] Some other ideas about the
> > questions... [ga-udrp]  UDRP   Questionnaire
> > Mime-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> > X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by dnso.dnso.org id
> SAA15510
> >
> > Marilyn et al:
> >
> > My research center at Syracuse University just received
> > funding support from the Markle Foundation to continue
> > quantitative tracking of UDRP decisions.
> >
> > The first report was published in November 2000 and
> > presented at the ICANN Marina del Rey meeting.
> > http://dcc.syr.edu/roughjustice.pdf
> >
> > We have since input much more extensive and richer data
> > and will produce a new report by October.
> >
> > The UDRP review Task Force questionnaire will not be a
> > rigorous or quantitative research/data collection document
> > but a means of soliciting public comment. Web-based surveys
> > do not and cannot provide representative samples.
> >
> > >>> "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com> 07/01/01 11:25AM >>>
> > I have for some time been a fan of actually analyzing the types of cases
> > which are brought and outcomes in order to support the evaluation
process.
> >
> >
>