[council] Dependence of the Names Council -- Case Proved

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>]

On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 00:11:27 +1000, Patrick Corliss wrote:
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc07/msg02599.html

> It seems to me that there are two or three approaches which can be used
> assuming you agree with the hypothesis that the General Assembly is not
> working as intended.  Probable reasons are as follows:
>
> (1)    Lack of Resources, Dependency.  The GA is hamstrung by the NC
> control over GA operations.  They (the NC) control the budget for travel
> to ICANN conferences, secretariat, website, legal advice, translation etc.
> The DNSO Secretariat is answerable to the NC not the GA.  The NC closed
> down all the working groups at whim.    More importantly the NC controls
> the mailing lists and the website.

<snip other reasons>

There's no point in pursuing the issue any further.  I've proved my case.

QED.

Best regards
Patrick Corliss