Re: [council] Search Committee report

["erica" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>]

Here are the selection criteria fyi


Proven technical skills and capabilities relevant to the key deliverables
outlined above;
Proven project management skills;
Proven ability to work effectively in a multicultural environment;
Demonstrated high level communication skills (the linga franca of the
Internet is English and applicants must have high level English language
written and oral communication skills, including technical writing skills);
Ability to work both independently and as a member of a team in an on-line
environment;
A demonstrated understanding of issues relating to the technical
administration of the domain name system (DNS) and the role played by the
DNSO and ICANN;
Cost;
Quality of service;
Security and redundancy provisions; and
Previous experience in providing similar services for international
organisations.



erica
----- Original Message -----
From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
To: "erica" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>; <council@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: [council] Search Committee report


> Erica,
>
> It would be of help for us to get more info before NC discuss
> this topic. Criteria used and evaluation table used for this selection.
>
> > Five of the eight respondents (Z,Y,W, V, and T) responded to
> > Part A only. Three respondents (S, R, and Q) responded to both sections
> > It was also announced at the Stockholm meeting of DNSO NC (June 3).
>
> According to the process described in this paper, it should be more
> clarified for the record, Erica.
>
> Even though it said, it was announced on June 3 during NC meting in
> Stockholm, which I had no memory on this during NC meeting and
> no record even in the meeting minutes.
>
> The first message to NC regarding this matter was on June 15 with
> five days left. I guess that was reason to be delayed for the proposal
> deadline.
>
> >Agreed that expressions of interest for the supply of ISP/Hosting
services
> >on a sponsored basis should be followed up and that, if appropriate,
> >the  ISP/hosting services should  be transitioned to a new supplier at
the
> >conclusion of the proposed 12 month contract with Loger Inc.
>
> Can NC also have access to the details of the contract?
>
> If my understanding is correct, the recommendation from the Search
> committee should get recognized from the NC.
>
> Appreciating Search committee's works and efforts, I would like to
> hear more explanations the difference between Part A's technical
> service and Part B's ISP/Web hosting.
>
> YJ
>
>
>