<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Re: NC Structure TF
Hi Danny, Peter and all:
I don't see any inconvenience that GA forms its own
working group and because in the TF that NC is
creating there is a GA representatives, then, I think
that such GA representative should be selected from
the group of people that would form such working
group, in order to provide provide during this
process, the inputs from GA working group to the NC
TF.
Any thinkings about this idea?
Best Regards
Vany
--- DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
> Dear Peter,
>
> Thank you for your reply. As much as I would like
> to proceed along the lines
> of your recommendation, our Bylaws state:
>
> The NC is responsible for the management of the
> consensus building process of
> the DNSO. It shall adopt such procedures and
> policies as it sees fit to carry
> out that responsibility, including the designation
> of such research or
> drafting committees, working groups and other bodies
> of the GA as it
> determines are appropriate to carry out the
> substantive work of the DNSO.
>
> As the Assembly is not imbued with this authority,
> we must rely upon the good
> will of the Council.
=====
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
Information Technology Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
http://www.sdnp.org.pa e-mail: vany@sdnp.org.pa
Go to http://www.getpaid4.com/cgi-bin/emailpanel.cgi?userid=659401 to receive FREE newsletters via email!
Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?sheharhore to make $$$ using YOUR OWN computer and sigining subscribers in YOUR OWN emails!
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone.
http://phone.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|