ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Item 2 NC agenda


Title: Message
I am opposed to this, especially the first paragraph which would totally exclude the geographic names.
 
Once begun, there could be "mission creep".
 
If countries wish to register their names, that is, governments, let them attempt to do so in the sunrise period, and make a case with WIPO.
 
This is an example of regulation which interferes with private business.
 
Finally, official sites in ccTLD gould be under .gov.xx  or .info perhaps  .gov.xx.info
 
for example   Tokyo.gov.jp  or  Tokyo.gov.jp.info
 
Peter de Blanc
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@dnso.org [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 8:14 AM
To: NC (list)
Subject: [council] Item 2 NC agenda

In preparation for item 2 - GAC statement in Montevideo of our meeting, I would appreciate comments on the attached proposed response. If there is support we can vote on this (or an amendment thereof) at the meeting.
 
 
Philip Sheppard
NC Chair


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>