<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Item 2 NC agenda
It was our IPC President that alerted me to this information.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Stubbs [mailto:kstubbs@digitel.net]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 2:01 PM
To: Chicoine, Caroline G.; council@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [council] Item 2 NC agenda
thanks for the good research caroline..
i also like the approach caroline has recommended here...
ken stubbs
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com>
To: <council@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 2:48 PM
Subject: FW: [council] Item 2 NC agenda
> I have since learned that WIPO Member State governments are, in fact,
> scheduled to discuss the issue of geographical identifiers as well as the
> other issues contained the WIPO-2 Report in two upcoming special sessions
> (the first is next month) of the WIPO Standing Committee on the Law of
> Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications, with the
> deadline of reporting to the WIPO General Assembly for consideration
before
> September, 2002. So there is no need for anyone within ICANN to task
WIPO
> on this. Perhaps the Names Council could simply acknowledge these ongoing
> WIPO activities in its resolution.
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|