<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] VGRS IDN
(Sorry for the previous bad formatted)
Roger
> If AFNIC or the ccTLD Constituency wanted to propose a suspension,
> when the proper time to have done so would not be a year after thousands of
> contracts for testbed service have been entered into.
Does your contracts specify a time to put this names in normal operation?
> The VeriSign Registry has made clear from the outset that it will
migrate to
> the IETF standard for IDN when that standard is finalized and that in the
> testbed it will employ standards that facilitate that migration. So there
> is simply no question over whether the VGRS IDN service will be
> non-standards-based.
What would you do if IETF find there is no way to have this service in an
apropriate way, "living" in the internet?
Thanks,
Oscar
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|