ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] VGRS IDN


(Sorry for the previous bad formatted)

Roger

 > If AFNIC or the ccTLD Constituency wanted to propose a suspension,
 > when the proper time to have done so would not be a year after thousands of
 > contracts for testbed service have been entered into.

Does your contracts specify a time to put this names in normal operation?

 > The VeriSign Registry has made clear from the outset that it will 
migrate to
 > the IETF standard for IDN when that standard is finalized and that in the
 > testbed it will employ standards that facilitate that migration.  So there
 > is simply no question over whether the VGRS IDN service will be
 > non-standards-based.

What would you do if IETF find there is no way to have this service in an
apropriate way, "living" in the internet?

Thanks,

Oscar



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>