FW: [council] Revised WLS Proposal (fwd)
I would like to add a discussion of this to the agenda for the Feb call. If it makes sense, perhaps Chuck could be invited to provide a brief summary. I guess the question I am asking myself is "Is this DNSO policy making of which the NC, rather than Verisign, should be managing the consensus?" Also, I note that we received Chuck's email on the 29th and it is my understanding that the deadline for providing comments is Feb 8th which only gives people only 10 days to respond." If I have read it wrong, could someone please advise what the deadline is and if not, do we think this is a reasonable period of time to comment? -----Original Message----- From: Cary Karp [mailto:ck@nic.museum] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:32 PM To: council@dnso.org Subject: [council] Revised WLS Proposal (fwd) Forwarded at the request of Chuck Gomes ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:45:55 -0500 From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com> To: Cary Karp <ck@nic.museum> Subject: Revised WLS Proposal I have attached two documents related to the wait listing service proposal submitted by VGRS to the Registrars Constituency on December 30, 2001: (1) a revised proposal based on feedback received from registrars and other interested parties; (2) a document titled, 'Justification for a Registry-based Wait Listing Service.' I would like to call your attention to the recommended procedures and guidelines for questions and feedback that are contained toward the beginning of the revised proposal. I would also like to note that the second document contains responses to the four points made by the Registrars Constituency in the official feedback provided to the initial proposal. It also contains responses to some of the other major issues raised with regard to the proposed service. Chuck Gomes Vice President, Policy & Compliance VeriSign Global Registry Services Registrar Wait Listing Proposal - FINAL 1-28-02.pdf Justification for WLS 1-28-02 FINAL.pdf |