RE: [council] REQUEST FROM gTLD REGISTRY CONSTITUENCY

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

I have a different but important proposal. I think that the chair and
alternate chairs of the GA need to be added. They can be a productive part
of our dialogue, and in addition, were asked to manage a process within the
GA by the NC.

Let's give them the same courtesy we all have; having both lets them share
the time commitment and if one isn't available, then probably the other can
be. This will be both helpful to the GA, I'm sure, but in addition, it
genuinely supports the role of the GA as part of the DNSO,and therefore
benefits the NC itself.


Regards, Marilyn

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Stubbs [mailto:kstubbs@digitel.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:15 AM
To: Names Council (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [council] REQUEST FROM gTLD REGISTRY CONSTITUENCY


fellow NC members

due to the "last minute" scheduling of this conference call and the
essential importance of this issue , i feel that there is no reason to deny
this request. the council had no opportunity for deliberation and i believe
it would be in the best interest of the council to have access by these
parties to the discussions.

ken stubbs

----- Original Message -----
From: "Cochetti, Roger" <RCochetti@verisign.com>
To: "Names Council (E-mail)" <council@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:02 AM
Subject: [council] REQUEST FROM gTLD REGISTRY CONSTITUENCY


>
>
> Roger J. Cochetti
> Senior Vice President & Chief Policy Officer
> VeriSign
> rcochetti@verisign.com
> 202-973-6600
>
>
>
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From: Neuman, Jeff
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:20 PM
> > To: 'philip.sheppard@aim.be'; 'secretariat@dnso.org'
> > Subject: NC Restructuring Calls
> >
> > Philip,
> >
> > It appears that one or possibly two of our representatives may not be
able
> > to be present on this week's NC call on Restructuring.  Because we do
> > intend as a constituency to fully participate, we were wondering if it
> > would be possible for us to have one or two people listen and
participate
> > on the call given the seriousness of the issue and the need to act
> > quickly.  As we cannot envision any formal votes on this topic during
> > these calls, I would hope that there would be no obstacle to having our
> > request granted.
> >
> > I can provide the names to you tomorrow if you would like.  We would
only
> > ask that a maximum of three gTLD reps be allowed to participate on the
> > call.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
> > Director, Policy and Intellectual Property
> > NeuLevel, Inc.
> > Loudoun Tech Center
> > 46000 Center Oak Plaza
> > Building X
> > Sterling, VA 20166
> > p: (202) 533-2733
> > f: (202) 533-2970
> > e-mail: Jeff.Neuman@NeuLevel.biz
> >
> > The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the
> > personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This
> > message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and
as
> > such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is
not
> > the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the
> > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
> > e-mail message and any attachments hereto in error and that any review,
> > dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
> > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
> > notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.
> >