<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Re: Open Letter to Mr Jeff Neuman from The Internet Challenge
- To: Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>, legal@neulevel.biz
- Subject: [council] Re: Open Letter to Mr Jeff Neuman from The Internet Challenge
- From: vint cerf <vinton.g.cerf@wcom.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 02:59:11 -0500
- Cc: Jeff.Neuman@neulevel.biz, lynn@icann.com, halloran@icann.org, jeff@air-speed.com, jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com, DEvans@doc.gov, ksmith@ntia.doc.gov, krose@ntia.doc.gov, fupton@doc.gov, Karl Auerbach <karl@cavebear.com>, Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>, lsuzukamo@pioneerpress.com, gtld@gtldregistries.org, ga@dnso.org, council@dnso.org, jarcher@registrationtek.com, aspaces@powerup.com.au, sotiris@hermesnetwork.com, conno001@maroon.tc.umn.edu, froomkin@law.miami.edu
- In-reply-to: <000901c1db1f$cfc13760$6d55fc3e@r6yll>
- References: <5.0.2.1.2.20020402212924.0286eb10@shoe.reston.mci.net>
- Sender: owner-council@dnso.org
Richard,
this sounds like "self-dealing" is that what you mean?
vint
At 03:56 PM 4/3/2002 +0100, Richard Henderson wrote:
>Dear Vint and Jeff
>
>I just want to forward this message I have posted at the ICANN NewTLDs
>Forum. It concerns Joshua Blacker, who was the registrant of all Signature's
>domains in last week's .biz release. He says he is a partner of the company.
>
>I'd really appreciate some response to this. Is it acceptable for a
>registrar to register high value names only for itself? And then there is
>the case of the other 5 Registrars who appear to have acted in a similar way
>(though obviously each case needs investigation).
>
>Regards
>
>Richard
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|