RE: [council] Non-commercial constituency - fees delinquency

["Djolakian, Laurence" <Laurence_Djolakian@mpaa.org>]

Title: RE: [council] Non-commercial constituency - fees delinquency

I agree as well,

L

-----Original Message-----
From: Ellen Shankman [mailto:ShankmanE@technologylaw.co.il]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:10 AM
To: 'J. Scott Evans'; Ken Stubbs; Cochetti, Roger; NC (list)
Subject: RE: [council] Non-commercial constituency - fees delinquency

I agree.

Ellen

Ellen B. Shankman, Adv.
EITAN, PEARL, LATZER & COHEN-ZEDEK
Telephone +972-9-9709026
Fax +972-9-9709001
Email - shankmane@technologylaw.co.il
Please visit our Resource and Research center at:
www.technoLAWgy.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. Scott Evans [SMTP:tmguy@carolina.rr.com]
> Sent: Fri, April 19, 2002 4:06 PM
> To:   Ken Stubbs; Cochetti, Roger; NC (list)
> Subject:      Re: [council] Non-commercial constituency - fees delinquency
> Importance:   High
>
> All:
> 
> Having reviewed the e-mails generated subsequent to Philips earlier
> missive.  I will recant my objection provided the Budget Committee makes
> arranges to meet within the very near future to consider the NCDHC's reply
> to the show cause notice.  I believe every constituency should be allowed
> the full benefit of the existing system. 
> 
> J. Scott Evans
>
>       ----- Original Message -----
>       From: Ken Stubbs <mailto:kstubbs@digitel.net>
>       To: Cochetti, Roger <mailto:RCochetti@verisign.com> ; NC (list)
> <mailto:council@dnso.org>
>       Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 8:36 AM
>       Subject: Re: [council] Non-commercial constituency - fees
> delinquency
>
>       This makes good sense to me
>       
>       ken stubbs
>
>               ----- Original Message -----
>               From: Cochetti, Roger <mailto:RCochetti@verisign.com>
>               To: 'Philip Sheppard' <mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be> ; NC
> (list) <mailto:council@dnso.org>
>               Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 7:39 AM
>               Subject: RE: [council] Non-commercial constituency - fees
> delinquency
>
>
>               Philip-
>
>               It is not a good idea for the Council to continuously make
> up new rules as it goes along.  Doing so undermines our credibility, since
> we appear to the world to be driven by momentary political influence,
> personalities, etc.  Having said that, we should reserve the suspension of
> our rules for genuinely important situations where the rules did not
> foresee an event.
>
>               In this case, under our existing procedures, the
> Non-Commercial Constituency was given a show cause notice, to which they
> replied.  We have been attempting to schedule a meeting of the Budget
> Committee to, among other things, examine the Constituency's response to
> the show cause notice and we have, in good faith, been unable to do so.  I
> do not believe that the Non-Commercial Constituency should bear the burden
> of our inability to schedule a meeting of the Committee and I do believe
> that this is a fairly important matter.
>
>               Under these circumstances, I agree with your suggestion that
> we suspend the Council's procedures in this case until the Council has had
> some reasonable time to consider a report from the Budget Committee on the
> Non-Commercial Constituency's response to the DNSO's show cause notice.
>
>               
>
>               Roger Cochetti
>
>               Chair
>
>               Names Council Budget Committee
>
>               Roger J. Cochetti
>               Senior Vice-President & Chief Policy Officer
>               VeriSign
>               (202) 973-6600
>               rcochetti@verisign.com
>
>                       -----Original Message-----
>                       From: Philip Sheppard
> [mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be]
>                       Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:12 AM
>                       To: NC (list)
>                       Subject: [council] Non-commercial constituency -
> fees delinquency
>                      
>                      
>                       The timetable leading to ultimate vote suspension
> for the non-commercial constituency due to non-payment of fees is
> approaching. The Budget Committee was scheduled April 24 to give a
> recommendation to the NC on a response to the constituency's "show cause"
> replies.
>                       
>                       In view of the enforced re-scheduling of that Budget
> Committee meeting I propose to the NC that we agree there will be no
> suspension of the non-commercial constituency's voting rights until the
> Budget committee holds its next meeting and makes a recommendation to the
> NC as a whole.
>                       
>                       Please let me know if you disagree with this
> proposal.
>                       
>                       Philip Sheppard
>                       NC Chair
>