ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Drfat NC resolution Reform - post Bucharest



 From the Draft NC resolution on reform:
>Further, the NC believes the steering committees should select all their 
>own members and their own chairs. The objective of imposed steering 
>committee members and an imposed chair from a Nominating Committee 
>fails the Board's test of a bottom-up process.

If I recall correctly, several constituencies have proposed
an alternative approach in Bucharest: *If* there are to be
appointed members, they should not come from the Nominating
Committee, but from the At Large entity to be created.

I would ask the DNSO constituencies to also consider the 
merits of such a proposal, especially since individual
users will once more have no seats on the GNSO Council
(they are only mentioned as an example of a possible 
provisional constituency).

Best regards,
/// Alexander



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>