ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Status report on implementation of evolution and reform


On strategy
So, if I am to understand Bruce, J.Scott and Ken, your idea is:
- to do nothing for the moment
- to see what ideas are generated elsewhere and then react to them
- to assume that every member of the Board read and agreed to every detail of the blueprint
- to assume that the rest of the Board resolution meant nothing.
 
Is that where we are ? 
 
On substance
The present recommendation for two reps per constituency on the Council will likely mean one US and one for the rest of the world to fight out. The Nom Com is not seeking to balance the diversity of the constituencies' representation but the diversity of the whole NC.  It is this aspect that the NC resolution seeks to address. Does the IPC want two reps only ? Do the Registrars want two reps only ? Do you assume the nom com may appoint other IP or Registrar interests as well ? I doubt it.
 
Philip
 
 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>