Re: [council] Status report on implementation of evolution and reform

[Erick Iriarte Ahon <faia@amauta.rcp.net.pe>]

I'm agree with Oscar..

Maybe is possible create a global mechanisms, i's not important in each
constituency is important in the result:

ever: almost 1 representant by each region. 

the "biggest" actors are US and EU, but is necessary the
representation from another parts of world.

Erick



At 04:53 p.m. 18/07/2002 -0500, Oscar A. Robles-Garay wrote:


> At 07:39 a.m. 18/07/2002, Philip
> Sheppard wrote:
> > The disadvantages of 2
> > reps per constituency are in my view compelling:
> > 1.Diversity. 2 reps will tend to polarise - one US,
> > one rest of world. 
>
> Let me say that this may be more dangerous for the geographic diversity
> issue.
>
> Two members means 1 rep for the US, 1 rep for Europe, so it makes more
> difficult for AP, AF an LAC regions to get one rep.
> So it is not (only) that US always will get one rep, but that other three
> regions unlikely will have one.
>
> Oscar
>
>
> > 2.Outreach.
> > Lack of direct connection from council member to region. 
> > 3.Representation. With 2 reps, most ICANN regions
> > will not be represented by constituency at council. Today most
> > are.