[council] Resolutions on reform
Joe,
as I understand it your sole objective is to create a
better forum for consensus decision making.
(Our objection to the current strategy to achieve this are
based on a possible scenario whereby suppliers may exploit the
proposed voting structure in ways that resist pro-competitive or other
pro-public interest change. You may characterise this as a potential
side effect).
You have argued the status quo is flawed. Does the
status quo provide examples of users forcing unreasonable demands on suppliers?
As users pay the final bill, it is not in our interests to do
so.
Also you have not explained why increasing the voting
strength of suppliers is more likely to produce true consensus. Users and
suppliers will have issues however one jiggles about with the votes.
I, and I believe, my fellow users, are open to hear this
explanation.
Philip
|